Showing posts with label Zachary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zachary. Show all posts

Friday, 19 September 2014

A Demystification Of Hedge Funds And The Risk For Investors

Written by Zachary Cefaratti, Risk Officer at Dalma Capital Management Limited – a DIFC asset manager specializing in Hedge Fund management.

www.dalmacapital.com

A demystification of hedge funds and the risk for investors

As investors in the GCC become increasingly sophisticated and continue to institutionalize there have been pioneers, early adopters and latecomers in the development of an alternatives (hedge funds) portfolio.  The region’s pioneers have been the sovereign wealth funds, with ADIA as the world’s largest single investor in hedge funds.  Some large and sophisticated family offices have followed the prudent lead of the Sovereign Wealth Funds along with a handful of corporates, foundations and wealth management firms – but regional allocations to the asset class still ominously lag their western peers at a time when the world’s institutional investors are increasing their hedge fund allocations.

Why sophisticated investors are selecting hedge funds?

The year 2014, which we previously proposed would be the ‘year of the hedge fund’ is already seeing large flows into the asset class and in 2015, the industry may manage more than $3.3 trillion according to a report by Boston Consulting Group.  The forces compelling inflows today are the same as those driving flows to hedge funds historically – they are primarily related to risk management.

10-15 years ago, the impetus to invest in hedge funds was to diversify overweight allocations to equities as valuations were historically high and expected returns withered.  Hedge funds provided uncorrelated returns that were expected to mitigate exposure to expected market downturns.  Historically, hedge funds best relative performance was generated when markets faired poorly.  Investors seeking to protect gains from the equity bull market of the 90’s sought hedge funds to manage risk and protect their downside.

Today, expensive bond markets combined with increasingly ‘dear’ equity valuations create a similar – yet in some ways starker backdrop as expected future returns on stocks and bonds fall in step.  Inflows and allocations to hedge funds are therefore likely to be best explained by investors seeking to protect their downside as uncertainty grows amid expensive stock and bond markets.

Risk Matters

Risk is often defined as volatility, but it is certainly not perceived this way by private investors.  The probability of losses, particularly large losses, is a more pragmatic definition of risk for the individual investor – as losses destroy the rate at which capital compounds.  To maintain a portfolio with long run growth, investors must achieve positive return asymmetry – this is where hedge funds excel.

Asymmetric Returns

A marketing phrase often used by hedge funds is that ‘hedge funds produce equity-like returns on the upside and bond-like returns on the downside’.  This statement may be an exaggeration and oversimplification, but it is not entirely untrue based on historical performance of hedge fund indices.  Hedge funds typically generate more modest returns during protracted equity bull markets, but outperform strongly during bear markets delivering a long-run return profile that is more positively asymmetric than the market index.

The key to maintaining superior long-term returns and positive compounding is positive asymmetry, which is achieved through robust risk management and avoidance of significant losses, as losses destroy the rate at which capital compounds.  Positive asymmetry is where hedge funds have delivered for investors by reducing the relative downside investors inevitably experience as financial markets ebb and flow.  The end result is relative outperformance by hedge fund indices on both a risk adjusted an absolute basis compared with major equity indices, such as the S&P 500®.

Risk Management

Hedge funds typically manage risk based on the premise that superior long run returns can be generated through strategic selection of assets.  Most hedge funds seeks to buy assets that they believe will outperform the market and sell/short assets they will believe will underperform.  Short positions and derivatives held by many hedge funds might be considered on a standalone basis to be risky and speculative, but as part of a typical hedge fund portfolio – these assets serve to offer protection or a ‘hedge’ against market downturns or volatility – often reducing risk for investors.

Empirical evidence demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach – with Hedge Fund indices posting long run out performance on both an absolute and a risk adjusted basis when compared to most market indices and other asset classes.  By reducing market correlation and mitigating downside risk – hedge funds have emerged as an essential component of the prudent investor’s portfolio.

Friday, 12 September 2014

Pressures for Increased Transparency resulting from MSCI’s Reclassification of UAE from Frontier to Emerging Market

Written by Zachary Cefaratti, Risk Officer at Dalma Capital Management Limited

Analysis by Ryan Mahoney, Portfolio Manager at Dalma Capital Management Limited

Dalma Capital Management Limited is a DFSA regulated asset manager operating in the DIFC; the company’s core business is hedge fund management. Dalma Capital Management provides services to professional and/or qualified clients only. The Company does not currently open or make available its unified return investment models or the Dalma Unified Return Fund to third party investors and Zachary Cefaratti is a Risk Officer at Dalma Capital Management Limited

MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International Indices) is no longer part of Morgan Stanley but is a worldwide, influential and leading provider of investment decision support tools.On 14 May 2014 MSCI announced the results of its semi-annual review meeting. As expected, the UAE and Qatar indices were reclassified from Frontier Markets to Emerging Markets.

This brings positive news to the market in terms of increased investor confidence, greater visibility of UAE companies to sophisticated investors worldwide, increase in foreign portfolio investment directed towards the UAE andimprovement in overall market efficiency. The upgrade and the assets that come with it are also likely to lead to pressures for increased transparency in order to achieve consistency with the market accessibility criteria set forth by MSCI for constituents of its Emerging Markets Index.

A country’s market accessibility is judged on the basis of four factors that include: openness to foreign ownership; ease of capital inflows and outflows; efficiency of the operational framework, and stability of the institutional framework.“To remain consistent with the Emerging Markets criterion and gradually move towards the ultimate goal of being classified as a Developed Market, the UAE and Qatar will need to deliver the requiredimprovements in all four factors assessing market accessibility,” concludes Elliot Carol, portfolio strategist at Dalma Capital Management Limited.

With regard to openness to foreign ownership, the MSCI upgrade will require local market stock have an increased focus on providing a level playing field for both international and local investors. Foreign ownership limit levels will inevitably need to be enhanced, with equal economic and voting rights being provided to foreign investors. In addition, the upgrade will necessitate that equal rights are provided to all minority shareholders.

The UAE is largely compliant with the ease of capital inflows and outflows factor;the country has already implemented a high degree of foreign exchange market liberalisation due to the existence of a developed onshore and offshore forex market. There are also no restrictions, as such, on inflows and outflows of foreign capital to and from the local stock market.Minimal restrictions are applicable to repatriation of foreign direct investment as well.

The key challenge will be improving efficiency of the operational framework and, just as importantly, maintaining it. Barriers to entry for investors will need to be lowered significantly, by minimizing the registration requirements for international investors as well as documentation/approvals required for setting up local accounts in order to decrease the overall time required for opening and funding an account. The legal and regulatory framework governing the financial market, stock exchanges and the various other financial markets participants will need to be improved, including ease of access to information(particularly in English),reduction of ambiguity and prompt enforcement of laws and regulations, as well as consistency amongst all of these factors over time.

A competitive landscape that encourages unrestricted investor access to derived stock market information, data and investment products will also be required; for example the provision of independently calculated indices or the creation of baskets of securities used in the creation of financial products.Likely the most important factor in improving transparency will be increased pressure for the timely disclosure of complete stock market information in English and under reasonable commercial terms to all market participants as well as the robustness and enforcement of accounting standards. These improvements will likely lead to reduced information asymmetry amongst investors and other market participants.

Constant improvements will be considered necessary in the market infrastructure as the UAE continues its path to “developed market” status. A well-functioning clearing and settlement system, based on international standards including delivery versus payment, the absence of pre-funding requirements and the possibility to use overdrafts will need to be in place. Availability of omnibus structures will be a key consideration. An efficient mechanism that prevents brokers from having unlimited access to an investor’s accounts, in order to guarantee the safe keeping of its assets will in all likelihood become mandatory and would require competition amongst local custodian banks as well as the presence of global custodian banks.

In addition, to ensure high quality of services offered to investors – such as cost efficient trading and ability to execute block trades at the same price for the various accounts of a fund manager –steps to increase competition amongst brokers will be inevitable. A framework for off-exchange transactions and in-kind transfers will likely be needed. Finally, there will be pressures to put in place an efficient mechanism to allow short selling as well as extensive use of stock lending, along with a robust but practical regulatory framework governing those activities.

Concerning the stability of the institutional framework – which deals with basic institutional principles such as the rule of law and its enforcement, the stability of the "free-market" economic system and track record of government intervention with regards to foreign investors – the requirements remain modest for countries classified as both Emerging and Frontier Markets.

Any country aiming to acquire the Developed Market status in the long term inevitably needs to focus on improving the stability of its institutional framework as well.

Tuesday, 20 May 2014

Zachary Cefaratti



Zachary Cefaratti is a Risk Officer at Dalma Capital Management and a director of the Dalma Unified Return Fund. He has over 10 years of professional experience in financial services and specializes in quantitative and computational analysis of asset returns. Zachary Cefaratti's primary responsibility is to maintain, update and ensure adherence to the Comprehensive Framework for Prudential Risk Management (CFPRM). Concurrently, Zachary Cefaratti graduated with a Double BA from Franklin University Switzerland in International Banking & Finance and International Business Management, with undergraduate and post-graduate work at in portfolio mathematics, accounting and economics at the London School of Economics (LSE), Foster School of Business and the University of Pennsylvania, respectively. Zachary is a US Citizen who is resident in Dubai.

Dalma Capital Management provides services to professional and/or qualified clients only. The Company does not currently open or make available its unified return investment models or the Dalma Unified Return Fund to third party investors. Past performance cannot be relied upon as an indication of future results. Dalma Capital Management Limited is a DFSA regulated asset manager operating in the DIFC: the company’s core business is hedge fund management. Zachary Cefaratti is responsible for back and middle office functions at Dalma Capital Management and supports the CEO in business development within the DIFC, GCC, Cayman Islands, United States and Europe.

Zachary Cefaratti, risk officer at Dalma Capital Management Limited, a DFSA regulated hedge fund manager in DIFC, said the decision by MSCI to upgrade the UAE and Qatar to Emerging Markets status from Frontier Markets status is likely to have profound, positive effects on domestic equity markets.